Torellian Invader (3" or 4" upscale): Difference between revisions

From Danno's Rocket Wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
A 3" upscale would be 5 feet tall; a 4" would be 6' 8" tall.
A 3" upscale would be 5 feet tall; a 4" would be 6' 8" tall.


For this rocket, it would be cool to mount (for instance) 29mm motor mounts in the tube fins. With a 54mm central motor, it wouldn't necessarily matter (stability wise) if some of them didn't light, and it would look cool with a white central motor and smoky outboard motors. Do tube fins have to be completely hollow to provide stability?
For this rocket, it would be cool to mount (for instance) 24mm black powder motors in the tube fins. (E12-0's? Dare I?) With a 54mm central motor, it wouldn't matter (stability wise) if some of them didn't light. Do tube fins have to be completely hollow to provide stability?
 
[[Category:Rockets]]

Latest revision as of 19:00, 8 May 2023

This is a placeholder page for a future project, to scratch build a 3" or 4" diameter upscaled Torellian Invader.

With fiberglass tube fins, it would probably require significant nose weight and a high thrust motor.

A 3" upscale would be 5 feet tall; a 4" would be 6' 8" tall.

For this rocket, it would be cool to mount (for instance) 24mm black powder motors in the tube fins. (E12-0's? Dare I?) With a 54mm central motor, it wouldn't matter (stability wise) if some of them didn't light. Do tube fins have to be completely hollow to provide stability?