Torellian Invader (3" or 4" upscale): Difference between revisions
(Created page with "This is a placeholder page for a future project, to scratch build a 3" or 4" diameter upscaled Torellian Invader.") |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is a placeholder page for a future project, to scratch build a 3" or 4" diameter upscaled Torellian Invader. | This is a placeholder page for a future project, to scratch build a 3" or 4" diameter upscaled Torellian Invader. | ||
With fiberglass tube fins, it would probably require significant nose weight and a high thrust motor. | |||
A 3" upscale would be 5 feet tall; a 4" would be 6' 8" tall. | |||
For this rocket, it would be cool to mount (for instance) 24mm black powder motors in the tube fins. (E12-0's? Dare I?) With a 54mm central motor, it wouldn't matter (stability wise) if some of them didn't light. Do tube fins have to be completely hollow to provide stability? | |||
[[Category:Rockets]] | |||
Latest revision as of 20:00, 8 May 2023
This is a placeholder page for a future project, to scratch build a 3" or 4" diameter upscaled Torellian Invader.
With fiberglass tube fins, it would probably require significant nose weight and a high thrust motor.
A 3" upscale would be 5 feet tall; a 4" would be 6' 8" tall.
For this rocket, it would be cool to mount (for instance) 24mm black powder motors in the tube fins. (E12-0's? Dare I?) With a 54mm central motor, it wouldn't matter (stability wise) if some of them didn't light. Do tube fins have to be completely hollow to provide stability?